On November 20, 2019 and January 10, 2020, investors filed two federal securities class actions in two United States District Courts alleging claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Following dismissal of one of those actions, the Court issued an Order on February 19, 2020, pursuant to the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, appointing the Lead Plaintiffs. In the same Order, the Court approved of Lead Plaintiffs’ selection of Barrack, Rodos & Bacine and Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann LLP as Lead Counsel for the Class.
The Operative Class Action Complaint for Violation of the Federal Securities Laws (“Complaint”) was filed on June 15, 2020. The Complaint alleges that during the period from February 25, 2017, through and including December 3, 2019, Defendants made materially misleading or false representations regarding Energy Transfer’s construction of a 350-mile set of pipeline projects across the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, consisting of the Mariner East 2 (“ME2”), Mariner East 2X (“ME2X,” and together with ME2, the “Mariner East 2 Pipelines”), and Revolution pipelines. These concerned: (i) the Mariner East 2 Pipelines’ and Revolution’s completion status and timelines, and the Mariner East 2 Pipelines’ stated initial throughput; (ii) Energy Transfer’s commitment to safety and regulatory compliance; and (iii) Energy Transfer’s compliance with its Code of Business Conduct and Ethics. The Complaint asserts that Defendants’ alleged misrepresentations and omissions caused investors to purchase Energy Transfer common units at artificially inflated prices and to suffer damages when the truth was revealed.
On April 6, 2021, the Court granted in part and denied in part Defendants’ motion to dismiss the Action. The Defendants have denied and continue to deny that they violated the federal securities laws as alleged in the Complaint.
Defendants filed an answer to the Complaint on June 11, 2021. Defendants deny any wrongdoing in this lawsuit and believe that the claims are without merit. Among other things, Defendants contend that the statements detailed in the Complaint were not materially false or misleading, that Defendants did not make the statements with the requisite intent to deceive investors, that they did not have a duty to disclose certain information to the public, and that the price of Energy Transfer’s common units was not impacted by the statements and alleged omissions at issue. Defendants also dispute the extent to which Class Members suffered recoverable losses.
On September 17, 2021, Lead Plaintiffs filed a motion for class certification through which they sought to certify a class of all investors who purchased or otherwise acquired Energy Transfer common units from February 25, 2017, through and including December 3, 2019, and who were damaged as a result of Defendants’ alleged violations of the federal securities laws. On August 23, 2022, the Court issued an Opinion and Order granting in part and denying in part Lead Plaintiffs’ motion for class certification. The Court certified a Class as defined in paragraph 1 above. The Court also appointed Lead Plaintiffs as class representatives and Barrack, Rodos & Bacine and Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann LLP as Class Counsel. On October 24, 2022, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied Defendants’ petition for leave to appeal the class certification Order.
The Court has not decided in favor of Lead Plaintiffs or Defendants. Discovery is now closed. On January 19, 2024, Defendants moved for summary judgment and Plaintiffs moved for partial summary judgment. The briefing on both motions was completed on March 29, 2024. A trial date has not yet been set by the Court.